
Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?
Author(s) -
Cheng HaoMin,
Chuang ShaoYuan,
Wang TzungDau,
Kario Kazuomi,
Buranakitjaroen Peera,
Chia YookChin,
Divinagracia Romeo,
Hoshide Satoshi,
Minh Huynh Van,
Nailes Jennifer,
Park Sungha,
Shin Jinho,
Siddique Saulat,
Sison Jorge,
Soenarta Arieska Ann,
Sogunuru Guru Prasad,
Sukonthasarn Apichard,
Tay Jam Chin,
Teo Boon Wee,
Turana Yuda,
Verma Narsingh,
Zhang Yuqing,
Wang JiGuang,
Chen ChenHuan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the journal of clinical hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1751-7176
pISSN - 1524-6175
DOI - 10.1111/jch.13758
Subject(s) - medicine , blood pressure , clinical practice , intensive care medicine , physical therapy
Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long‐term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost‐effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP‐guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.