z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fixed‐dose vs free‐dose combinations for the management of hypertension—An analysis of 81 958 patients
Author(s) -
Bramlage Peter,
Schmidt Stefanie,
Sims Helen
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the journal of clinical hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1751-7176
pISSN - 1524-6175
DOI - 10.1111/jch.13240
Subject(s) - medicine
Fixed‐dose combinations (FDC) have been developed to reduce the pill burden for hypertensive patients. Data on fixed‐dose or free‐dose (freeDC) ramipril/amlodipine (R/A) or candesartan/amlodipine (C/A) combination treatment initiation were assessed. 71 463 patients were prescribed R/A and 10 495 C/A. For both R/A and C/A, FDC patients were younger (both P  < .001) and less comorbid. Prior MI (OR: 0.61 and 0.60), prior stroke (OR: 0.68 and 0.70) and CHD (OR: 0.68 and 0.64) were negatively associated with FDC use, whereas hyperlipidemia was positively associated (OR: 1.26 and 1.19). Use of antihypertensive comedication (OR: 0.78; OR: 0.55) and treatment discontinuation within 12 months (HR: 0.65 and 0.82) were less likely in FDC patients, who also showed superior adherence (mean MPR; both P  < .001). Cost of the combination was higher for FDCs (both P  < .001). FDCs improve persistence and adherence, although they are more commonly prescribed in patients with less cardiovascular disease.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here