z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of the angiotensin II receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil in African‐American patients with hypertension
Author(s) -
Johnson Wallace,
White William B.,
Sica Domenic,
Bakris George L.,
Weber Michael A.,
Handley Alison,
Perez Alfonso,
Cao Charlie,
Kupfer Stuart,
Saunders Elijah B.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the journal of clinical hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1751-7176
pISSN - 1524-6175
DOI - 10.1111/jch.12993
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , ambulatory blood pressure , confidence interval , ambulatory , blood pressure , adverse effect , clinical endpoint , incidence (geometry) , randomized controlled trial , gastroenterology , pathology , physics , optics , alternative medicine
The efficacy and safety of azilsartan medoxomil ( AZL ‐M) were evaluated in African‐American patients with hypertension in a 6‐week, double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial, for which the primary end point was change from baseline in 24‐hour mean systolic blood pressure ( BP ). There were 413 patients, with a mean age of 52 years, 57% women, and baseline 24‐hour BP of 146/91 mm Hg. Treatment differences in 24‐hour systolic BP between AZL ‐M 40 mg and placebo (−5.0 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −8.0 to −2.0) and AZL ‐M 80 mg and placebo (−7.8 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, −10.7 to −4.9) were significant ( P ≤.001 vs placebo for both comparisons). Changes in the clinic BP s were similar to the ambulatory BP results. Incidence rates of adverse events were comparable among the treatment groups, including those of a serious nature. In African‐American patients with hypertension, AZL ‐M significantly reduced ambulatory and clinic BP s in a dose‐dependent manner and was well tolerated.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here