Ambulatory vs Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in Renal Transplant Recipients
Author(s) -
Ahmed Jafar,
Ozorio Valerie,
Farrant Maritza,
Van Der Merwe Walter
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the journal of clinical hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1751-7176
pISSN - 1524-6175
DOI - 10.1111/jch.12448
Subject(s) - medicine , ambulatory blood pressure , masked hypertension , blood pressure , ambulatory , renal function , white coat hypertension , transplantation , cardiology , renal transplant , proteinuria , intensive care medicine , kidney
Hypertension is common following renal transplantation and has adverse effects on cardiovascular and graft health. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ( ABPM ) is better at overall blood pressure ( BP ) assessment and is necessary to diagnose nocturnal hypertension, which is also implicated in poor outcomes. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 98 renal transplant recipients ( RTR s) and compared office BP and ambulatory BP recordings. ABPM revealed discordance between office BP and ambulatory BP in 61% of patients, with 3% caused by white‐coat and 58% caused by masked hypertension (of which 33% were caused by isolated nocturnal hypertension). Overall, mean systolic BP was 3.6 mm Hg (0.5–6.5) and diastolic BP was 7.5 mm Hg (5.7–9.3) higher via ambulatory BP than office BP . This was independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, transplant time/type, and comorbidities. A total of 42% of patients had their management changed after results from ABPM . ABPM should be routinely offered as part of hypertension management in RTR s.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom