Premium
Ultrahigh resolution electroanatomical mapping of the transverse conduction of the right atrial posterior wall in cases with and without typical atrial flutter
Author(s) -
Sekihara Takayuki,
Miyazaki Shinsuke,
Nagao Moeko,
Kakehashi Shota,
Mukai Moe,
Aoyama Daisetsu,
Nodera Minoru,
Eguchi Tomoya,
Hasegawa Kanae,
Uzui Hiroyasu,
Tada Hiroshi
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/jce.14850
Subject(s) - atrial flutter , coronary sinus , medicine , cardiology , blockade , ablation , thermal conduction , block (permutation group theory) , geometry , materials science , mathematics , receptor , composite material
The right atrial posterior wall (RAPW) is known to form a conduction barrier during typical atrial flutter (AFL). We evaluated the transverse conduction properties of RAPW in patients with and without typical AFL using an ultrahigh resolution electroanatomical mapping system. Methods and Results This study included 41 patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF, typical or atypical AFL, in whom we performed RAPW mapping with an ultrahigh resolution mapping system during typical AFL and coronary sinus ostial pacing with three different pacing cycle lengths (PCLs) (1) PCL1: PCL within 40 ms of the AFL cycle length in patients with typical AFL or 250–300 ms for those without, (2) PCL2: 400 ms, (3) PCL3: PCL just faster than the sinus rate. Local RAPW conduction block was evaluated by propagation mapping and local double potentials separated by an isoelectric line. The functional block was defined as areas blocked during shorter PCLs but conductive during longer PCLs. The degree of blockade was calculated by dividing the blocked length by RAPW length (%blockade). Only two patients demonstrated a fixed complete RAPW block (100%, %blockade). Thirty‐one patients demonstrated a partial block of RAPW, and the %blockade during PCL1‐3 was 49.4 ± 19.8%, 39.5 ± 19.2%, and 35.0 ± 22.9% in this group, respectively. Functional block areas were frequently observed above the fixed block area adjacent to the RA‐inferior vena cava junction. Transverse conduction block was more frequently observed in patients with typical AFL at any longitudinal level of RAPW. Conclusion RAPW transverse conduction block is lower‐side dominant and greater in patients with typical AFL than those without.