z-logo
Premium
Focal and pseudo/rotational activations in human atrial fibrillation defined with automated periodicity mapping
Author(s) -
Nayyar Sachin,
Ha Andrew C. T.,
Timmerman Nicholas,
Suszko Adrian,
Ragot Don,
Chauhan Vijay S.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/jce.14812
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary vein , atrial fibrillation , ablation , cardiology , catheter ablation
Defining atrial fibrillation (AF) wave propagation is challenging unless local signal features are discrete or periodic. Periodic focal or rotational activity may identify AF drivers. Our objective was to characterize AF propagation at sites with periodic activation to evaluate the prevalence and relationship between focal and rotational activation. Methods We included 80 patients (61 ± 10 years, persistent AF 49%) from the FaST randomized trial that compared the efficacy of adjunctive focal site ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation. Patients underwent left atrial (LA) activation mapping with a 20‐pole circular catheter during spontaneous or induced AF. Five‐second bipolar and unipolar electrograms in AF were analyzed. Periodic sites were identified by spectral analysis of the bipolar electrogram. Activation maps of periodic sites were constructed using an automated, validated tracking algorithm, and classified into three patterns: focal sites (FS), rotation (RO), or pseudo‐rotation (pRO). Results The most common propagation pattern at periodic sites was FS for 5‐s in all patients (4.9 ± 1.9 per patient). RO and pRO were observed in two and seven patients, respectively, but were all transient (3–5 cycles). Activation from a FS evolved into transient RO/pRO in five patients. No patient had autonomous RO/pRO activations. Patients with RO/pRO had greater LA surface area with periodicity (78 ± 7 vs. 63 ± 16%, p  = .0002) and shorter LA periodicity CL (166 ± 10 vs. 190±28 ms, p  = .0001) than the rest. Conclusion Using automated, regional AF periodicity mapping, FS is more prevalent and temporally stable than RO/pRO. Most RO/pRO evolve from neighboring FS. These findings and their implications for AF maintenance require verification with global, panoramic mapping.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here