Premium
Utility of high density multielectrode mapping during ablation of scar‐related ventricular tachycardia
Author(s) -
Cano Óscar,
Plaza Diego,
Saurí Assumpció,
Osca Joaquín,
Alonso Pau,
Andrés Ana,
SanchoTello MaríaJosé,
MartínezDolz Luis
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/jce.13302
Subject(s) - medicine , ablation , ventricular tachycardia , cardiology , catheter ablation , endocardium
Multielectrode mapping catheters (MEMC) allow the performance of high resolution and density maps but the utility of these catheters in ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures has not been yet widely described. We sought to evaluate the utility of a MEMC during scar‐related VT ablation procedures. Methods Eighty‐five consecutive scar‐related VT ablation procedures were performed in 81 patients. In the first 26 procedures, a standard 3.5‐mm tip linear catheter was employed for endocardial/epicardial mapping (control group). In the following 59 procedures mapping was performed with a MEMC (study group). Procedural time, LV endocardial and epicardial mapping time, complications and ablation outcomes were compared. Results The use of the MEMC resulted in a significant shortening of the endocardial and epicardial mapping times (38 ± 15 minutes vs. 56 ± 24 minutes for endocardial LV mapping in the study and control group, respectively, P = 0.001; and 28 ± 9 minutes vs 41 ± 16 minutes, for epicardial mapping, P = 0.011) as well as the total procedural time (177 ± 53 minutes vs. 206 ± 50 minutes, respectively, P = 0.02). The mapping density was also significantly increased in the study group (mean endocardial LV points: 2,143 ± 1,419 vs. 485 ± 174, for the study and control group, respectively, P < 0.0001), specially within the scar area (49.6 ± 34 points/cm 2 vs. 8.4 ± 4.6 points/cm 2 , P < 0.001). No differences in acute and long‐term follow‐up outcomes were observed. Conclusions High‐density multielectrode mapping is associated with a significant reduction of procedural and mapping times and a significant increase of mapping density without affecting outcomes in patients with scar‐related VT.