Premium
Automatic identification of knowledge‐transforming content in argument essays developed from multiple sources
Author(s) -
Raković Mladen,
Winne Philip H.,
Marzouk Zahia,
Chang Daniel
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of computer assisted learning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.583
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2729
pISSN - 0266-4909
DOI - 10.1111/jcal.12531
Subject(s) - argumentative , paraphrase , computer science , argument (complex analysis) , domain knowledge , natural language processing , identification (biology) , typology , linguistics , artificial intelligence , sociology , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , botany , anthropology , biology
Developing knowledge‐transforming skills in writing may help students increase learning by actively building knowledge, regardless of the domain. However, many undergraduate students struggle to transform knowledge when drafting essays based on multiple sources. Writing analytics can be used to scaffold knowledge transforming as writers bring evidence to bear in supporting claims. We investigated how to automatically identify sentences representing knowledge transformation in argumentative essays. A synthesis of cognitive theories of writing and Bloom's typology identified 22 linguistic features to model processes of knowledge transforming in a corpus of 38 undergraduates' essays. Findings indicate undergraduates mostly paraphrase or copy information from multiple sources rather than engage deeply with sources' content. Eight linguistic features were important for discriminating evidential sentences as telling versus transforming source knowledge. We trained a machine learning algorithm that accurately classified nearly three of four evidential sentences as knowledge‐telling or knowledge‐transforming, offering potential for use in future research.