Premium
Estimating Annual Groundwater Evapotranspiration from Phreatophytes in the Great Basin Using Landsat and Flux Tower Measurements
Author(s) -
Beamer Jordan P.,
Huntington Justin L.,
Morton Charles G.,
Pohll Greg M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/jawr.12058
Subject(s) - groundwater recharge , evapotranspiration , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental science , flux (metallurgy) , water balance , groundwater , vegetation (pathology) , precipitation , hydrography , water table , tower , aquifer , geography , geology , meteorology , medicine , ecology , materials science , geotechnical engineering , cartography , pathology , metallurgy , biology , archaeology
Escalating concerns about water supplies in the G reat B asin have prompted numerous water budget studies focused on groundwater recharge and discharge. For many hydrographic areas ( HA s) in the G reat B asin, most of the recharge is discharged by bare soil evaporation and evapotranspiration ( ET ) from phreatophyte vegetation. Estimating recharge from precipitation in a given HA is difficult and often has significant uncertainty, therefore it is often quantified by estimating the natural discharge. As such, remote sensing applications for spatially distributing flux tower estimates of ET and groundwater ET ( ET g ) across phreatophyte areas are becoming more common. We build on previous studies and develop a transferable empirical relationship with uncertainty bounds between flux tower estimates of ET and a remotely sensed vegetation index, Enhanced Vegetation Index ( EVI ). Energy balance‐corrected ET measured from 40 flux tower site‐year combinations in the G reat B asin was statistically correlated with EVI derived from L andsat imagery ( r 2 = 0.97). Application of the relationship to estimate mean‐annual ET g from four HA s in western and eastern N evada is highlighted and results are compared with previous estimates. Uncertainty bounds about the estimated mean ET g allow investigators to evaluate if independent groundwater discharge estimates are “believable” and will ultimately assist local, state, and federal agencies to evaluate expert witness reports of ET g , along with providing new first‐order estimates of ET g .