z-logo
Premium
Weight beliefs and messages: Mindsets predict body‐shame and anti‐fat attitudes via attributions
Author(s) -
Burnette Jeni L.,
Hoyt Crystal L.,
Dweck Carol S.,
AusterGussman Lisa
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/jasp.12464
Subject(s) - shame , attribution , psychology , weight stigma , social psychology , stigma (botany) , obesity , overweight , psychiatry , medicine
In two samples ( N  = 247, N  = 291), we examined the link between beliefs and messages about the changeable (incremental theory) vs. fixed (entity theory) nature of weight, attributions for weight, and body shame. We recruited participants using online sampling, employing a correlational design in Study 1 and an experimental design in Study 2. Across both studies, we found evidence for the stigma‐asymmetry effect—incremental, relative to entity beliefs/messages of weight predicted both (a) stronger onset responsibility attributions, indirectly increasing body shame and (b) stronger offset efficacy attributions, indirectly decreasing body shame. Study 2 replicated the stigma‐asymmetry effect with anti‐fat attitudes. We discuss implications for public health obesity messages with the goal of reducing stigma.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here