Premium
The role of social dominance orientation and patriotism in the evaluation of racial minority and female leaders
Author(s) -
Hoyt Crystal L.,
Simon Stefanie
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/jasp.12380
Subject(s) - social dominance orientation , patriotism , dominance (genetics) , psychology , social psychology , white (mutation) , sexual orientation , political science , politics , law , biochemistry , chemistry , authoritarianism , democracy , gene
This research broadens our understanding of racial and gender bias in leader evaluations by merging implicit leadership theory and social dominance perspectives. Across two experimental studies (291 participants), we tested the prediction that bias in leader evaluations stemming from White and masculine leader standards depends on the extent to which people favor hierarchical group relationships (social dominance orientation) and their level of patriotism. Employing the Goldberg paradigm, participants read identical leadership speeches attributed to either a woman or a man described as either a minority (Black or Latino/a) or a majority (White) group member. Results show social dominance orientation negatively predicted evaluations of minority and female leaders and patriotism positively predicted evaluations of White leaders.