Premium
Position toward the status quo: Explaining differences in intergroup perceptions between left‐ and right‐wing affiliates
Author(s) -
Bäck Emma A.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/jasp.12160
Subject(s) - status quo , ideology , opposition (politics) , social psychology , system justification , attribution , perception , politics , psychology , position (finance) , left wing politics , left and right , status quo bias , social dominance orientation , political science , law , economics , authoritarianism , structural engineering , finance , neuroscience , democracy , engineering
Challengers, as opposed to defenders, of the status quo ascribe more negative motives for the attitudes of their opponents and more positive motives to their allies. This may be associated with a heightened social cost involved in challenging the generally considered good and true. Most social issues are associated with ideology, and conservatives display more prejudices than liberals. Hence, it is unclear whether ideology or position toward the status quo per se drives these attributions. In two studies, position showed to be a stronger predictor of biased intergroup perceptions than ideology. Both left‐ and right‐wing affiliates displayed stronger biases when in opposition. This supports the notion that the challenging position per se , elicits group differentiation. Results are important for understanding of negative campaigning and political action.