z-logo
Premium
Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame
Author(s) -
Kamau Caroline,
GinerSorolla Roger,
Zebel Sven
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/jasp.12048
Subject(s) - shame , blame , psychology , social psychology , preference , collective responsibility , law , political science , economics , microeconomics
Recipients of intergroup apologies have been found to prefer expressions of shame over guilt. However, there is little research comparing the responses of a wronged group with those of a blamed group. Kenyans/Britons evaluated guilt/shame statements about colonialism, with blame measured as the assignment of collective guilt to Britain. Among Britons, there was a significant interaction, with high in‐group blamers expecting more reconciliation from shame than from guilt, and vice versa for low in‐group blamers. Among Kenyans, there was no main effect of blame, but more reconciliation was expected from shame than from guilt. Wronged groups thus appear to prefer shame over guilt, whereas preference for guilt/shame among members of a blamed group depends on the level of in‐group blame.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here