English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Background  Due to incompatibilities in communication, it is key that family members and support staff can take the perspective of people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities ( ID ) whilst putting aside their own perspectives.    Method  Ten vignettes describing types of restraint interventions ( RI s) were presented to 20 unique pairs of support staff and family members related to individuals with moderate to profound  ID .    Results  In taking their own perspective, more than half of the support staff and family members perceived all  RI s as involuntary and severe. In contrast, when asked to put themselves in the position of the client/family member, only three  RI s were considered involuntary by a majority of support staff and family members.    Conclusions  These results indicate that support staff and family members can take into account the perspective of people with moderate to profound  ID  in the evaluation and consideration of involuntary care.

Restraint interventions in people with moderate to profound intellectual disabilities: Perspectives of support staff and family members