Premium
A qualitative exploration of participants’ experiences of taking part in a walking programme: Perceived benefits, barriers, choices and use of intervention resources
Author(s) -
Mitchell Fiona,
Stalker Kirsten,
Matthews Lynsay,
Mutrie Nanette,
Melling Chris,
McConnachie Alex,
Murray Heather,
Melville Craig A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1468-3148
pISSN - 1360-2322
DOI - 10.1111/jar.12326
Subject(s) - pedometer , thematic analysis , intellectual disability , psychology , intervention (counseling) , focus group , qualitative research , applied psychology , population , reading (process) , gerontology , medical education , developmental psychology , physical activity , medicine , physical therapy , social science , environmental health , marketing , psychiatry , sociology , law , business , political science
Background Adults with intellectual disabilities ( ID ) experience significant inequalities and tend to be more sedentary and less physically active than the wider population. Walking programmes are an effective way to increase physical activity ( PA ) but have not been used in studies involving adults with intellectual disabilities. Method Nineteen adults with intellectual disabilities participated in semistructured interviews or focus groups exploring their experiences of taking part in a walking programme (Walk Well). Data were coded using thematic analysis. Results Four overarching themes emerged: perceived benefits of taking part in the programme, perceived drawbacks/ barriers, walking choices and using the Walk Well resources. While there was not a significant increase in walking for all, the participants reported positive experiences of taking part in the programme. Self‐monitoring proved difficult for some, particularly reading the daily step count recorded on the pedometer and writing it in the diary. Carers also played an important role in facilitating and preventing behaviour change in adults with intellectual disabilities. Conclusion Additional barriers prevent many adults with intellectual disabilities from participating in PA . Capturing participant experiences provides important information for designing effective and equitable health improvement programmes.