Premium
A Comparison of Two Methods for Recruiting Children with an Intellectual Disability
Author(s) -
Adams Dawn,
Handley Louise,
Heald Mary,
Simkiss Doug,
Jones Alison,
Walls Emily,
Oliver Chris
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1468-3148
pISSN - 1360-2322
DOI - 10.1111/jar.12263
Subject(s) - intellectual disability , phone , sample (material) , psychology , telephone interview , sample size determination , medicine , psychiatry , social science , linguistics , philosophy , chemistry , statistics , mathematics , chromatography , sociology
Background Recruitment is a widely cited barrier of representative intellectual disability research, yet it is rarely studied. This study aims to document the rates of recruiting children with intellectual disabilities using two methods and discuss the impact of such methods on sample characteristics. Methods Questionnaire completion rates are compared between (i) participants being approached in child development centre waiting rooms and (ii), one year later, the same participants being invited to take part by phone, email and/or post. Results The face‐to‐face recruitment method resulted in a better recruitment rate (58.5% compared to 18.5%) and a larger sample ( n = 438) than the telephone/email/post sample ( n = 40). It also required less hours of researcher time per completed questionnaire. Conclusions In‐line with previous research, recruitment of participants with intellectual disabilities (or their parents/carers) requires significant time and resources to get a sample of an acceptable size.