Premium
虽有类似,但却不同:对全科和非全科执业机构的医生和护理师提供初级保健的看法
Author(s) -
Moldestad Megan,
Greene Preston A.,
Sayre George G.,
Neely Emily L.,
Sulc Christine A.,
Sales Anne E.,
Reddy Ashok,
Wong Edwin S.,
Liu ChuanFen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/jan.14501
Subject(s) - nursing , primary care , exploratory research , nurse practitioners , medicine , veterans affairs , perception , health care , qualitative research , family medicine , medline , psychology , political science , neuroscience , law , social science , sociology , anthropology
Aims To understand patients’ and providers’ perceptions of primary care delivered by nurse practitioners (NPs) in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Design Qualitative exploratory study (in convergent mixed‐methods design). Methods Semi‐structured interviews in 2016 with primary care providers and patients from facilities in states with full and restricted practice authority for NPs. Patient sample based on reassignment to: (a) a NP; or (b) a different physician following an established physician relationship. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results We interviewed 28 patients, 17 physicians and 14 NPs. We found: (a) NPs provided more holistic care than physicians; (b) patients were satisfied with NPs; and (c) providers’ professional experience outweighed provider type. Conclusions Patients’ preferences for NPs (compared with prior physicians) contributed to perceptions of patient centredness. Similarities in providers’ perceptions suggest NPs and physicians are both viable providers for primary care. Impact Nurse Practitioners (NPs): practice authority Veterans Affairs Health care: nurse practitioners will continue to be a viable resource for primary care delivery United States Health care: challenges notions patients may not be satisfied with care provided by NPs and supports expanding their use to provide much‐needed access to primary care services; expanding Full Practice Authority would allow states to provide acceptable primary care without diminishing patient or provider experiences