Premium
Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis
Author(s) -
BookeyBassett Sue,
MarkleReid Maureen,
Mckey Colleen A.,
AkhtarDanesh Noori
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/jan.13162
Subject(s) - cinahl , context (archaeology) , nursing , teamwork , medline , medicine , disease management , multidisciplinary approach , interprofessional education , health care , disease , psychology , psychological intervention , paleontology , social science , pathology , sociology , political science , parkinson's disease , law , economics , biology , economic growth
Aim To report a concept analysis of interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management, for older adults living in communities. Background Increasing prevalence of chronic disease among older adults is creating significant burden for patients, families and healthcare systems. Managing chronic disease for older adults living in the community requires interprofessional collaboration across different health and other care providers, organizations and sectors. However, there is a lack of consensus about the definition and use of interprofessional collaboration for community‐based chronic disease management. Design Concept analysis. Data sources Electronic databases CINAHL , Medline, HealthStar, EMBASE , Psych INFO , Ageline and Cochrane Database were searched from 2000 ‐ 2013. Methods Rodgers' evolutionary method for concept analysis. Results The most common surrogate term was interdisciplinary collaboration. Related terms were interprofessional team, multidisciplinary team and teamwork. Attributes included: an evolving interpersonal process; shared goals, decision‐making and care planning; interdependence; effective and frequent communication; evaluation of team processes; involving older adults and family members in the team; and diverse and flexible team membership. Antecedents comprised: role awareness; interprofessional education; trust between team members; belief that interprofessional collaboration improves care; and organizational support. Consequences included impacts on team composition and function, care planning processes and providers' knowledge, confidence and job satisfaction. Conclusion Interprofessional collaboration is a complex evolving concept. Key components of interprofessional collaboration in chronic disease management for community‐living older adults are identified. Implications for nursing practice, education and research are proposed.