z-logo
Premium
Health professionals’ decision‐making in wound management: a grounded theory
Author(s) -
Gillespie Brigid M.,
Chaboyer Wendy,
St John Winsome,
Morley Nicola,
Nieuwenhoven Paul
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/jan.12598
Subject(s) - grounded theory , wound care , health care , nursing , multidisciplinary approach , psychology , medicine , knowledge management , qualitative research , sociology , social science , intensive care medicine , computer science , economics , economic growth
Aim To develop a conceptual understanding of the decision‐making processes used by healthcare professionals in wound care practice. Background With the global move towards using an evidence‐base in standardizing wound care practices and the need to reduce hospital wound care costs, it is important to understand health professionals’ decision‐making in this important yet under‐researched area. Design A grounded theory approach was used to explore clinical decision‐making of healthcare professionals in wound care practice. Methods Interviews were conducted with 20 multi‐disciplinary participants from nursing, surgery, infection control and wound care who worked at a metropolitan hospital in Australia. Data were collected during 2012–2013. Constant comparative analysis underpinned by Strauss and Corbin's framework was used to identify clinical decision‐making processes. Findings The core category was ‘balancing practice‐based knowledge with evidence‐based knowledge’. Participants’ clinical practice and actions embedded the following processes: ‘utilizing the best available information’, ‘using a consistent approach in wound assessment’ and ‘using a multidisciplinary approach’. The substantive theory explains how practice and evidence knowledge was balanced and the variation in use of intuitive practice‐based knowledge versus evidence‐based knowledge. Participants considered patients’ needs and preferences, costs, outcomes, technologies, others’ expertise and established practices. Participants’ decision‐making tended to be more heavily weighted towards intuitive practice‐based processes. Conclusion These findings offer a better understanding of the processes used by health professionals’ in their decision‐making in wound care. Such an understanding may inform the development of evidence‐based interventions that lead to better patient outcomes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here