Premium
A companionship between strangers – the hospital environment as a challenge in patient–patient interaction in oncology wards
Author(s) -
Larsen Lene Søndergård,
Larsen Birte Hedegaard,
Birkelund Regner
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/jan.12204
Subject(s) - thematic analysis , qualitative research , interpersonal communication , participant observation , medicine , interpersonal relationship , nursing , health care , affect (linguistics) , psychology , family medicine , social psychology , social science , communication , sociology , anthropology , economics , economic growth
Aim To present an identification and discussion of the impact of the hospital environment on interaction among people with cancer. Background In recent years, researchers have focused on identifying and describing features of the hospital environment that promote healing, recovery and well‐being. It has been discovered that architectural features affect hospitalized patients both positively and negatively. But the research has failed to include fellow patients as part of the hospital environment. Design A qualitative approach influenced by ethnography. Method Participant observation and individual qualitative interviews were used to collect data. From a total of 85 observed people with cancer 10 men and 10 women were interviewed. Data were collected over 6 months in 2010–2011 and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings Patients had ambiguous views regarding their fellow patients and the hospital environment. The hospital environment imposed conditions that caused stress factors such as the loss of personal privacy and control, but it also offered the possibility of good company and support from fellow patients. Refuge from fellow patients was hard to achieve and the fact that personal conversations might be overheard by fellow patients caused patients to withhold important information from healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, patients accepted the hospital environment uncritically, with resignation or with silent rebellion. Despite the challenges, 18 of 20 patients preferred multiple‐bed rooms with the company of fellow patients. Conclusion The influence of the hospital environment on hospitalized people with cancer and their interpersonal interaction needs to be acknowledged by healthcare professionals. In addition, evidence‐based hospital design must include research into patient preferences and arguments. Further investigation is needed.