Premium
Validation of alternative indicators of social support in perinatal outcomes research using quality of the partner relationship
Author(s) -
Kruse Julie A.,
Low Lisa Kane,
Seng Julia S.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1111/jan.12015
Subject(s) - social support , psychology , operationalization , clinical psychology , predictive validity , proxy (statistics) , domestic violence , construct validity , postpartum depression , poison control , social psychology , suicide prevention , medicine , psychometrics , statistics , environmental health , philosophy , mathematics , genetics , pregnancy , epistemology , biology
Aim To test alternatives to the current research and clinical practice of assuming that married or partnered status is a proxy for positive social support. Background Having a partner is assumed to relate to better health status via the intermediary process of social support. However, women's health research indicates that having a partner is not always associated with positive social support. Design An exploratory post hoc analysis focused on posttraumatic stress and childbearing was conducted using a large perinatal database from 2005–2009. Methods To operationalize partner relationship, four variables were analysed: partner (‘yes’ or ‘no’), intimate partner violence (‘yes’ or ‘no’), the combination of those two factors, and the woman's appraisal of the quality of her partner relationship via a single item. Construct validity of these four alternative variables was assessed in relation to appraisal of the partner's social support in labour and the postpartum using linear regression standardized betas and adjusted R ‐squares. Predictive validity was assessed using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression modelling. Results Four groups were compared. Married, abused women differed most from married, not abused women in relation to the social support, and depression outcomes used for validity checks. The variable representing the women's appraisals of their partner relationships accounts for the most variance in predicting depression scores. Conclusions Our results support the validity of operationalizing the impact of the partner relationship on outcomes using a combination of partnered status and abuse status or using a subjective rating of quality of the partner relationship.