z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of air samplers and filter materials for collection and recovery of airborne norovirus
Author(s) -
Uhrbrand K.,
Koponen I. K.,
Schultz A. C.,
Madsen A. M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of applied microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.889
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2672
pISSN - 1364-5072
DOI - 10.1111/jam.13588
Subject(s) - aerosolization , norovirus , environmental science , filter (signal processing) , sampling (signal processing) , microplastics , chromatography , aerosol , pulp and paper industry , murine norovirus , bioaerosol , waste management , chemistry , environmental chemistry , biology , virology , engineering , virus , organic chemistry , anatomy , inhalation , electrical engineering
Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to identify the most efficient sampling method for quantitative PCR ‐based detection of airborne human norovirus (NoV). Methods and Results A comparative experiment was conducted in an aerosol chamber using aerosolized murine norovirus ( MNV ) as a surrogate for NoV. Sampling was performed using a nylon ( NY ) filter in conjunction with four kinds of personal samplers: Gesamtstaubprobenahme sampler ( GSP ), Triplex‐cyclone sampler ( TC ), 3‐piece closed‐faced Millipore cassette (3P) and a 2‐stage NIOSH cyclone sampler ( NIO ). In addition, sampling was performed using the GSP sampler with four different filter types: NY , polycarbonate ( PC ), polytetrafluoroethylene ( PTFE ) and gelatine ( GEL ). The sampling efficiency of MNV was significantly influenced by both sampler and filter type. The GSP sampler was found to give significantly ( P  <   0·05) higher recovery of aerosolized MNV than 3P and NIO . A higher recovery was also found for GSP compared with TC , albeit not significantly. Finally, recovery of aerosolized MNV was significantly ( P  <   0·05) higher using NY than PC , PTFE and GEL filters. Conclusions The GSP sampler combined with a nylon filter was found to be the best method for personal filter‐based sampling of airborne NoV. Significance and Impact of the Study The identification of a suitable NoV air sampler is an important step towards studying the association between exposure to airborne NoV and infection.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here