z-logo
Premium
Effects of feeding rate on the growth performance of gynogenetic albino sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus (Linnaeus, 1758) larvae
Author(s) -
Laczynska B.,
Siddique M. A. M.,
Liszewski T.,
Kucinski M.,
FoppBayat D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of applied ichthyology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.392
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1439-0426
pISSN - 0175-8659
DOI - 10.1111/jai.13317
Subject(s) - biology , larva , zoology , ploidy , artemia salina , rotifer , ecology , biochemistry , toxicity , medicine , gene
Summary The feeding rate effects were studied on the growth performance of gynogenetic diploid larvae of sterlet Acipenser ruthenus during the first 4 weeks of exogenous feeding. The experimental rearing was conducted from 7 to 38 days post‐hatch (dph) in a circulation system. This was set up in four groups with three replicates (440 individuals/replicate), viz: AC ‐control larvae fed Artemia sp., CFC ‐control larvae fed compound feed, AG ‐gynogenetic larvae fed Artemia sp., and CFG ‐gynogenetic larvae fed compound feed. The larvae were reared in glass tanks (44 L volume, 10 individuals/L) with the temperature maintained at 18 ± 0.5°C, photoperiod of 12L:12D and water flow regime of 1‐L/min and fed 50%, 25%, 25%, and 9% of their total biomass/day during feeding. Highest TL and WBW of gynogenetic diploid larvae ( AG ) were observed with 50.6 ± 1.2 mm and 607.3 ± 36.1 mg ( n  = 30) at 38 dph. Highest TL and WBW of control larvae ( AC ) were recorded with 49.5 ± 3.8 mm and 600.8 ± 88.0 mg ( n  = 30), respectively, with 73.1% ± 11.4% survival; the lowest survival rate was at 46.4% ± 7.1% ( n  = 30) for the CFG group. The results indicate that the gynogenetic and normal larvae of sterlet fed with live food ( Artemia nauplii) from 7 dph can achieve higher growth and survivability compared to the larvae fed with formulated test feed. Results of this study suggest that the effective rearing of sterlet larvae from 7 to 38 dph strongly depends upon the types of feed rather than the genome manipulation performed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here