Premium
Limited influence of a wind power project submarine cable on a Laurentian Great Lakes fish community
Author(s) -
Dunlop E. S.,
Reid S. M.,
Murrant M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied ichthyology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.392
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1439-0426
pISSN - 0175-8659
DOI - 10.1111/jai.12940
Subject(s) - electrofishing , round goby , alewife , neogobius , fishery , habitat , offshore wind power , ecology , oceanography , biology , wind power , fish <actinopterygii> , geology
Summary Previous research has identified the generation of electromagnetic fields ( EMF s) emanating from renewable energy project transmission cables to be a potential stressor to aquatic communities. In this study, we investigated whether the presence of a high voltage submarine transmission cable affected the spatial pattern and composition of nearshore and offshore fishes at a Laurentian Great Lakes site. The transmission cable investigated in this study runs 7.8 km along the lakebed of Lake Ontario, carrying electricity from the Wolfe Island wind power project to the city of Kingston, Ontario. In autumn of 2011, both nearshore electrofishing and deeper‐water fisheries acoustic surveys were conducted along transects at varying distances to the cable. For both habitat types, no detectable effects of the cable on the fish community were found. Local habitat variables, including substrate or depth, were more important in explaining variation in fish density than proximity to the cable. Common species encountered during the surveys were round goby ( Neogobius melanostomus ) in the nearshore and alewife ( Alosa pseudoharengus ) in the deeper channel. American eel ( Anguilla rostrata ), thought to be an electromagnetically sensitive species, was also encountered during the surveys including in close proximity to the cable. More robust impact assessments require sampling fishes before a cable installation, over greater time frames (additional seasons or years), and habitats that support more diverse native assemblages.