z-logo
Premium
What Cost of Capital Should You Use? The Market Has an Answer
Author(s) -
Zolotoy Leon,
John Andrew
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied corporate finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1745-6622
pISSN - 1078-1196
DOI - 10.1111/jacf.12196
Subject(s) - capital asset pricing model , cost of capital , economics , financial economics , value premium , cost of equity , discounting , systematic risk , security market line , market portfolio , risk premium , cash flow , implicit cost , business , stock market , microeconomics , finance , profit (economics) , paleontology , total cost , horse , biology
The most widely used means of estimating a company's cost of equity capital is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). But as a growing number of academics and practitioners have suggested, use of the CAPM produces estimates that often fail to reflect the risks of the companies as perceived by current and potential investors. The authors' work, together with other research, also suggests that the cost of equity produced by the CAPM is often too high. To the extent this is so, companies are discounting investment projects at rates of return that may be leading them to pass up value‐adding opportunities. The authors advocate the use of a simple and practical alternative to the CAPM that does not use either an assumed market risk premium or a beta. It uses instead an equity premium that is implied by the current market price of a company's stock and, as such, is implicitly derived from investors' assessments of the firm's risk that are reflected in that price. More specifically, the alternative approach solves for the internal rate of return that equates the present value of expected future cash flows to the current market price. In support of this approach, studies have shown that such market‐implied measures are better predictors than CAPM‐based estimates of future stock returns, both at the individual‐firm and aggregate market levels.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here