Premium
Investigation of the acousto‐optical properties of Ge–As–Te–(Se) chalcogenide glasses at 10.6 μm wavelength
Author(s) -
Cao Zhenfei,
Dai Shixun,
Liu Zijun,
Liu Chengcheng,
Ding Shengjie,
Lin Changgui
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/jace.17767
Subject(s) - chalcogenide , materials science , chalcogenide glass , ultrasonic sensor , figure of merit , elastic modulus , optics , attenuation , wavelength , analytical chemistry (journal) , optoelectronics , composite material , chemistry , physics , acoustics , chromatography
Abstract The acousto‐optic parameters of Ge 10 As 90− x Te x ( x = 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 mol%) and Ge 10 As 20 Te 70− y Se y ( y = 20, 30, 40, 50 mol%) glasses, were studied systematically to compare the pros and cons of Te‐based and Se‐based chalcogenide glasses in acousto‐optic performance, as well as the thermomechanical properties. In the Ge 10 As 90− x Te x system, the acousto‐optic figure of merit (M 2 ) increased with increased Te content, and the maximum M 2 of 2279 × 10 −18 s 3 /g, which is 13 times that of commercial single‐crystal Ge, obtained in Ge 10 As 20 Te 70 at 10.6 μm. However, its thermal properties and elastic modulus decreased and the acoustic attenuation ( α ) at different ultrasonic frequencies increased accordingly. In the Ge 10 As 20 Te 70− y Se y system, the thermomechanical performance of the glasses improved with the introduction of Se element, the overall α was lower than that of Te‐based chalcogenide glasses, and the minimum α was 5.29 dB/cm at 30 MHz ultrasonic frequency, although its M 2 was inferior to that of Te‐based chalcogenide glasses. Additionally, the difference in the α of these glasses was smaller at low ultrasonic frequencies than at high ultrasonic frequencies. This work will promote the practical application of chalcogenide glasses as promising materials with outstanding acousto‐optic properties in low ultrasonic frequency acousto‐optic devices.