Premium
Effect of structural relaxation on crystal nucleation in a soda‐lime‐silica glass
Author(s) -
Rodrigues Lorena R.,
Abyzov Alexander S.,
Fokin Vladimir M.,
Zanotto Edgar Dutra
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/jace.17765
Subject(s) - nucleation , supercooling , relaxation (psychology) , soda lime , crystal (programming language) , thermodynamics , viscosity , materials science , glass transition , classical nucleation theory , mineralogy , chemistry , composite material , physics , polymer , psychology , social psychology , computer science , programming language
The influence of structural relaxation on crystal nucleation has been underexplored and remains elusive. This article discusses its possible effect on the nucleation process using a stoichiometric soda‐lime‐silica (2Na 2 O·CaO·3SiO 2 ) glass as a model system. We show that the relaxation effect is powerful at low temperatures, close and below the glass transition, T g , and leads to a continuous increase in the nucleation rate. At any given temperature, the nucleation rate eventually reaches its ultimate steady‐state corresponding to the fully relaxed supercooled liquid (SCL). However, the time to reach the steady‐state is two to three orders of magnitude longer than the average relaxation time estimated by the Maxwell relation (shear viscosity / shear modulus). The proposed nucleation mechanism and model, which take relaxation into account, and related experimental results also explain the alleged “breakdown” of CNT at low temperatures reported for various glasses. It confirms a few recent papers that this apparent flaw is merely because most researchers did not prolong nucleation treatments enough to complete the relaxation process to achieve a steady state. Another remarkable result is that the actual maximum nucleation temperature, T max , is significantly lower than the previously reported values. Finally, a comparative analysis of the kinetic coefficient using viscosity versus growth velocity favors the last. These results for this soda‐lime‐silica glass extend and validate recent findings for lithium disilicate on the significant (but often neglected) effect of relaxation on crystal nucleation.