Premium
Survey of acceptor dopants in SrTiO 3 : Factors limiting room temperature hole concentration
Author(s) -
Bowes Preston C.,
Baker Jonathon N.,
Irving Douglas L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/jace.16784
Subject(s) - impurity , acceptor , strontium titanate , dopant , materials science , doping , analytical chemistry (journal) , condensed matter physics , chemistry , nanotechnology , thin film , physics , optoelectronics , organic chemistry , chromatography
Abstract Unintentional impurities often found in strontium titanate (doped or undoped) have hindered efforts to study individual impurities experimentally. To fill this gap, a computational survey of acceptor‐type point defects of common intentional or unintentional impurities (Al, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, N, Na, Ni, and Zn) is presented. Utilizing defect formation energies from density functional theory using hybrid exchange correlation functionals in a grand canonical model of the defect chemistry, the equilibrium Fermi level ( μ e ) was calculated as a function of processing conditions for pure SrTiO 3 , SrTiO 3 individually doped with each impurity, and SrTiO 3 co‐doped with Al and N. Above a certain concentration, each impurity reduced the maximum predicted hole concentration relative to the intrinsic case. Al, Mg, Zn, K, and Na exhibited similar trends and behaved more like ideal acceptors while N, Ni, Fe, Mn, and Cu were all unique and pinned μ e near or above the mid‐gap in most conditions. Al/N:SrTiO 3 also exhibited similar trends at 800°C for all Al/N ratios, but more variation at 25°C. Additionally, the behavior of Al:SrTiO 3 was not recovered until Al/N = 10 4 . This suggests that to achieve SrTiO 3 with free holes at room temperature, the concentration of most impurities must be controlled.