z-logo
Premium
Microstructure, magnetism, and high‐frequency performance of polycrystalline Ni 0.5 Zn 0.5 Sm 0.025 Ho x Fe 1.975− x O 4 ferrites
Author(s) -
Yang Pao,
Qi Hongbin,
Liu Zhiqing,
Fu Xiuli,
Peng Zhijian
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/jace.16652
Subject(s) - materials science , curie temperature , microstructure , crystallite , magnetism , analytical chemistry (journal) , coercivity , magnetization , sintering , dopant , grain size , nanocrystalline material , nuclear magnetic resonance , doping , mineralogy , condensed matter physics , ferromagnetism , metallurgy , chemistry , nanotechnology , magnetic field , physics , optoelectronics , chromatography , quantum mechanics
Novel polycrystalline Ni 0.5 Zn 0.5 Sm 0.025 Ho x Fe 1.975− x O 4 ( x  = 0‐0.06) ferrites were fabricated by a traditional solid‐state reaction sintering method. The codoping effects of Sm and Ho on the microstructure, magnetism, and high‐frequency performance of Ni–Zn ferrites were investigated. The substitution of Sm 3+ and Ho 3+ ions led to an apparent increase in the lattice constants. However, further increasing the addition of both dopants introduced SmFeO 3 or HoFeO 3 foreign phases at the boundaries of the polycrystalline grains. As the content of Ho 3+ ions increased, the relative density and average grain size of the specimens decreased accordingly. Moreover, the substitution of Sm 3+ clearly decreased the saturation magnetization and complex permeability, which further decreased with the doping of Ho 3+ . The evolution of the Curie temperature showed an opposite trend, reaching the highest temperature of 278°C when x =  0.03. Similarly, the coercivity and resonance frequencies also displayed opposite trends compared to those of the saturation magnetization and complex permeability. The codoping of Sm 3+ and Ho 3+ more effectively lowered the magnetic and dielectric loss tangent of the specimens compared with the undoped or single dopant modified ferrites.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here