Premium
A Conversation on Object‐Centered Learning in Art Museums
Author(s) -
Rice Danielle,
Yenawine Philip
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
curator: the museum journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.312
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2151-6952
pISSN - 0011-3069
DOI - 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00066.x
Subject(s) - conversation , visual arts , opposition (politics) , art methodology , visual arts education , object (grammar) , sociology , contemporary art , museology , art , aesthetics , pedagogy , the arts , art history , political science , performance art , linguistics , philosophy , communication , politics , law
Danielle Rice and Philip Yenawine are veteran art museum educators who have wrestled for decades with the thorny issues involved in teaching about and learning from art objects in the museum setting. While there is general agreement within art museums today that the object should be the focus of educational practice, debate continues as to the most effective processes for facilitating learning. Gallery teaching is one of the most contested arenas, with much of the disagreement centering on the place of information in teaching beginning viewers. In art museums, the issue of what and how to teach is complicated by the fact that many people, including artists, museum professionals, psychologists and educators consider art primarily as something to be enjoyed, and they posit this enjoyment in direct opposition to learning about art. Partly because of this, the function of art museum education and gallery‐based instruction is still evolving.