Premium
Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration
Author(s) -
Egeberg D. L.,
Kjærulff S.,
Hansen C.,
Petersen J. H.,
Glensbjerg M.,
Skakkebæk N. E.,
Jørgensen N.,
Almstrup K.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
andrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 2047-2927
pISSN - 2047-2919
DOI - 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00082.x
Subject(s) - hemocytometer , sperm , semen , pipette , cytometry , reproducibility , semen analysis , andrology , cell counting , biomedical engineering , flow cytometry , computer science , biology , chromatography , chemistry , medicine , immunology , cell , infertility , pregnancy , biochemistry , genetics , cell cycle
Summary In the basic clinical work‐up of infertile couples, a semen analysis is mandatory and the sperm concentration is one of the most essential variables to be determined. Sperm concentration is usually assessed by manual counting using a haemocytometer and is hence labour intensive and may be subjected to investigator bias. Here we show that image cytometry can be used to accurately measure the sperm concentration of human semen samples with great ease and reproducibility. The impact of several factors (pipetting, mixing, round cell content, sperm concentration), which can influence the read‐out as well as inter‐operator and ‐cytometer variation on two different image cytometers (NC‐3000 and SP‐100) were evaluated. Furthermore, 725 semen samples were assessed both by manual assessment (WHO recommended method) and by image cytometry and tight correlations between the measured concentrations were shown. Moreover, by evaluation of repeated measurements it appeared that image cytometry produced more consistent and accurate measurements than manual counting of human spermatozoa concentration. In conclusion, image cytometry provides an appealing substitute of manual counting by providing reliable, robust and easy measurement of human sperm concentration.