Premium
Assessing good qualitative research in the work psychology field: A response to the commentaries
Author(s) -
Cassell Catherine,
Symon Gillian
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of occupational and organizational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.257
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 2044-8325
pISSN - 0963-1798
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02043.x
Subject(s) - field (mathematics) , psychology , narrative , qualitative research , work (physics) , qualitative analysis , social psychology , epistemology , applied psychology , sociology , social science , physics , philosophy , linguistics , mathematics , pure mathematics , thermodynamics
This article is a response to three commentaries (Halbesleben, 2011; Hickson, 2011 & Locke, 2011) on ‘Assessing “good” qualitative research in the work psychology field: A narrative analysis’ (Cassell & Symon, 2011).