z-logo
Premium
Stable unstable reliability theory
Author(s) -
Thomas Hoben,
Lohaus Arnold,
Domsch Holger
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
british journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.157
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 2044-8317
pISSN - 0007-1102
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2010.02011.x
Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , mathematics , reliability engineering , econometrics , statistics , computer science , engineering , physics , thermodynamics , power (physics)
Classical reliability theory assumes that individuals have identical true scores on both testing occasions, a condition described as stable. If some individuals’ true scores are different on different testing occasions, described as unstable, the estimated reliability can be misleading. A model called stable unstable reliability theory (SURT) frames stability or instability as an empirically testable question. SURT assumes a mixed population of stable and unstable individuals in unknown proportions, with w i the probability that individual i is stable. w i becomes i ’s test score weight which is used to form a weighted correlation coefficient r w which is reliability under SURT. If all w i = 1 then r w is the classical reliability coefficient; thus classical theory is a special case of SURT. Typically r w is larger than the conventional reliability r , and confidence intervals on true scores are typically shorter than conventional intervals. r w is computed with routines in a publicly available R package.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom