z-logo
Premium
Determining whether an experimental group is stochastically larger than a control
Author(s) -
Wilcox Rand R.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
british journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.157
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 2044-8317
pISSN - 0007-1102
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1990.tb00944.x
Subject(s) - simple (philosophy) , group (periodic table) , mathematics , statistics , control (management) , function (biology) , subject (documents) , econometrics , computer science , artificial intelligence , physics , epistemology , philosophy , quantum mechanics , evolutionary biology , library science , biology
Let μ x and μ y be the means of a control and an experimental group, respectively. The usual method of comparing the two groups is in terms of μ x ‐μ y by testing H 0 :μ x = μ y . This approach might suffice when the corresponding distributions differ only in location. When the distributions differ in other respects, a shift function can be more informative. For example, it might be the case that the typical subjects who perform poorly under a standard method will, on the average, benefit from a new treatment, while the new treatment is actually detrimental for the typical subject who does well under the established procedure. Another possibility, which is illustrated in the paper, is that μ y >μ x might be true even though for most subjects the experimental group is detrimental. This paper describes a simple method for determining whether these situations have occurred.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom