z-logo
Premium
Circularity and multiple comparisons in repeated measure designs
Author(s) -
Mitzel Howard C.,
Games Paul A.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
british journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.157
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 2044-8317
pISSN - 0007-1102
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1981.tb00635.x
Subject(s) - pairwise comparison , mathematics , variance (accounting) , statistics , measure (data warehouse) , monte carlo method , covariance matrix , covariance , one way analysis of variance , variance components , population , multiple comparisons problem , matrix (chemical analysis) , analysis of variance , computer science , data mining , accounting , materials science , business , composite material , demography , sociology
In an RS × T design, MS T /MS RST is distributed as F with the usual df only if the population variance‐covariance matrix has ε = 1.0. This same condition is needed for the usual multiple comparison procedures to be accurate. When testing K — 1 orthogonal contrasts the conventional estimate of the variance of the contrasts is the mean of the K — 1 different true variance estimates. This condition also is observed when testing all pairwise contrasts. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that with reasonable ns , little power is lost using a robust general matrix solution. The conventional solution will often be inaccurate when ε < 1.0.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom