Premium
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS BASED ON AN INSTRUMENT FOR MEASURING ADVISER PERCEPTION
Author(s) -
Kupper Lawrence L.,
Hulka Barbara S.,
Cassel John C.
Publication year - 1973
Publication title -
british journal of mathematical and statistical psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.157
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 2044-8317
pISSN - 0007-1102
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1973.tb00514.x
Subject(s) - perception , set (abstract data type) , measure (data warehouse) , mathematics , null hypothesis , statistics , statistical hypothesis testing , psychology , social psychology , econometrics , computer science , data mining , neuroscience , programming language
An instrument is described for measuring the degree to which an adviser perceives' his advisees' attitudes. Its application requires each of n advisees to respond to a form consisting of c items. For each item, the adviser is instructed to respond as he thinks the particular advisee under consideration did. If X ij = j th advisee's response to the i th item, and if Y ij = adviser's estimate of X ij , then θ ij = | X ij – Y ij | is a reasonable measure of response discrepancy. Since the distribution of θ ij for a given patient response X ij = x depends on x , an ‘equitable’ comparison between two advisers must take into account differences in the distributions of advisee responses. A ‘standardized’ perception score is developed which reflects the fractional gain in perception from its worst possible value, conditional on the observed set of advisee responses. A method for testing the null hypothesis that two advisers are equally perceptive is given and a numerical example is included which illustrates the necessity for standardizing.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom