Premium
Implications of free will beliefs for basic theory and societal benefit: Critique and implications for social psychology
Author(s) -
Vonasch Andrew J.,
Baumeister Roy F.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
british journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 2044-8309
pISSN - 0144-6665
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02102.x
Subject(s) - prejudice (legal term) , psychology , just world hypothesis , social psychology , empathy , poverty , motivated reasoning , sign (mathematics) , economic justice , law , political science , mathematical analysis , mathematics , politics
Greater belief in free will is associated with greater empathy towards the working poor, support for social mobility, greater desire for socio‐economic equality, and less belief that poor people are fated to live in poverty. We found no sign that belief in free will led to prejudice or discrimination against poor people or undercut justice. These findings from an online survey flatly contradict the claims made by James Miles (2013). Belief in a just world did produce many of the patterns Miles attributed to belief in free will. We also question the reasoning and the strength of the purported evidence in his article, and we recommend that future writers on the topic should cultivate cautious, open‐minded consideration of competing views. Miles’ article is a useful reminder that to some writers, the topic of free will elicits strong emotional reactions.