Premium
Kirton's A–I theory: Evidence bearing on the style/level and factor composition issues
Author(s) -
Mudd Samuel
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
british journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.536
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 2044-8295
pISSN - 0007-1269
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02588.x
Subject(s) - conceptualization , psychology , creativity , style (visual arts) , homogeneous , set (abstract data type) , cognitive psychology , social psychology , epistemology , cognitive science , artificial intelligence , computer science , mathematics , philosophy , archaeology , combinatorics , history , programming language
Two central issues concerning M. J. Kirton's adaption–innovation (A–I) theory, the style vs. level issue and the issue of factor number, are reviewed in terms of existing empirical research. Direct tests of those two issues as they apply to A–I theory indicate that Kirton's position holds. Although the directly applicable evidence is not extensive, that which is available supports Kirton's distinction between style and level of creativity and a simple three‐factor structure underlying the hypothesized AI continuum. These two findings support the conceptualization of creativity as a non‐homogeneous, differentiated set of psychological processes.