Premium
Experimenter bias against subliminal perception? A rejoinder
Author(s) -
Barber Paul J.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
british journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.536
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 2044-8295
pISSN - 0007-1269
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01590.x
Subject(s) - subliminal stimuli , psychology , perception , cognitive psychology , social psychology , neuroscience
The basis for Spence & Smith's (1977) critique of three replications of subliminal perception experiments is judged to be conjectural. The case that the replications were less sensitive to subliminal perception effects than the original experiments is evaluated and rebutted.