Premium
Pattern detection by mongol and non‐mongol subnormals
Author(s) -
McDONALD G.,
MACKAY D. N.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
british journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.536
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 2044-8295
pISSN - 0007-1269
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1977.tb01579.x
Subject(s) - numerical digit , repetition (rhetorical device) , memory span , psychology , arithmetic , recall , communication , mathematics , cognitive psychology , cognition , linguistics , working memory , neuroscience , philosophy
Ten mongols and ten clinically heterogeneous subnormals matched on chronological age, mental age and digit span took part in an experiment in which tape‐recorded supra‐span digit sequences with different patterns were presented. There were six patterns: random, mirror (e.g. 583385); same‐digit pairs (e.g. 558833), same‐digit throughout (e.g. ), couplet repetition (e.g. 585858) and triplet repetition (583583). The numbers of digits correctly recalled in any order by the mongols in the various conditions ranked from least to most were: random, mirror, same‐digit pairs, same‐digit messages, triplet repetition and couplet repetition. The rank order for the non‐mongols was the same except that the positions of couplet and triplet repetition were reversed. Mongols had significantly poorer recall for random, mirror and same‐digit‐pair messages than non‐mongols but were their equals in other conditions. The mongols' performance was more sensitive to pattern than the performance of the other subjects. There was some evidence that, in the messages with same‐digit pairs and the same digit throughout, all subjects (but mongols in particular) tended to insert new digits into the response sequence and that the digit introduced was the next one in simple arithmetic progression. It would appear that the hypothesis about poor auditory‐vocal channelling capacities of mongols needs qualification.