Premium
PREADOLESCENT SELF‐CONCEPT: ITS RELATION TO SELF‐CONCEPT AS INFERRED BY TEACHERS AND TO ACADEMIC ABILITY
Author(s) -
MARSH H. W.,
PARKER J. W.,
SMITH I. D.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
british journal of educational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.557
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 2044-8279
pISSN - 0007-0998
DOI - 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02536.x
Subject(s) - psychology , optimal distinctiveness theory , self concept , academic achievement , construct (python library) , developmental psychology , social psychology , reading (process) , mathematics education , computer science , political science , law , programming language
S ummary . The purpose of this study is to relate student self‐concept in seven different areas to teacher ratings of student self‐concept in the same areas and to academic ability. The results from three diverse samples are considered (total N = 958 students). Student‐teacher agreement on student self‐concept varied from modest (r = 0.24 for Relationship With Parents) to good (r = 0.52 for Mathematics Self‐concept) for the seven self‐concept dimensions (mean r = 0.40), was higher in academic areas than non‐academic areas, and was particularly good for academic self‐concept in the high SES sample (r = 0.74). A multitrait‐multimethod analysis of this student‐teacher agreement demonstrated the distinctiveness of the seven dimensions and argued for the multidimensionality of self‐concept. Academic abilities (reading achievement, IQ, and teacher ratings of ability in different areas) tended to be uncorrelated with non‐academic dimensions of self‐concept, moderately correlated with the academic dimensions, and most highly correlated with the academic dimension of self‐concept that most closely matched the particular academic ability. These correlations were largest in the high SES sample where several correlations exceeded 0.7. Further discussion suggested possible reasons why the results of this study provide better support for the construct validity of self‐concept than is typically reported.