Premium
Do we need different frameworks to explain infant MNEs from developing countries?
Author(s) -
Narula Rajneesh
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
global strategy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.814
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 2042-5805
pISSN - 2042-5791
DOI - 10.1111/j.2042-5805.2012.01035.x
Subject(s) - multinational corporation , internationalization , developing country , business , set (abstract data type) , industrial organization , nationality , emerging markets , international trade , economics , economic growth , computer science , immigration , political science , finance , law , programming language
I argue that the initial set of firm‐specific assets (FSAs) act as an envelope for the early stages of internationalization of multinational enterprises (MNEs) (of whatever nationality) AND THAT there is a threshold LEVEL of FSAs that IT must possess for such international expansion to be SUCCESSFUL. I also argue that the initial FSAs of an MNE tend to be constrained by the location‐specific (L) assets of the home country. However, beyond different initial conditions, there are few obvious reasons to insist that INFANT developing country MNEs are of unique character THAN ADVANCED ECONOMY MNEs, and I predict that as they evolve, the observable differences between the two groups will diminish. Successful firms will increasingly explore internationalization, but there is also no reason to believe that this is likely to happen disproportionately from the developing countries.