Premium
Comparative learning theory and its application in the training of horses
Author(s) -
COOPER J. J.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
equine veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.82
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 2042-3306
pISSN - 0425-1644
DOI - 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb05144.x
Subject(s) - reinforcement , psychology , classical conditioning , stimulus (psychology) , conditioning , extinction (optical mineralogy) , cognitive psychology , praise , punishment (psychology) , audiology , stimulus control , animal learning , developmental psychology , social psychology , neuroscience , medicine , biology , mathematics , statistics , paleontology , nicotine
Summary Training can best be explained as a process that occurs through stimulus‐response‐reinforcement chains, whereby animals are conditioned to associate cues in their environment, with specific behavioural responses and their rewarding consequences. Research into learning in horses has concentrated on their powers of discrimination and on primary positive reinforcement schedules, where the correct response is paired with a desirable consequence such as food. In contrast, a number of other learning processes that are used in training have been widely studied in other species, but have received little scientific investigation in the horse. These include: negative reinforcement, where performance of the correct response is followed by removal of, or decrease in, intensity of a unpleasant stimulus; punishment, where an incorrect response is paired with an undesirable consequence, but without consistent prior warning; secondary conditioning, where a natural primary reinforcer such as food is closely associated with an arbitrary secondary reinforcer such as vocal praise; and variable or partial conditioning, where once the correct response has been learnt, reinforcement is presented according to an intermittent schedule to increase resistance to extinction outside of training.