Premium
REPLY TO JUSTIN D'ARMS AND LORI WATSON
Author(s) -
SLOTE MICHAEL
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the southern journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.281
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 2041-6962
pISSN - 0038-4283
DOI - 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00064.x
Subject(s) - watson , empathy , morality , moral psychology , moral character , epistemology , anger , psychology , psychoanalysis , character (mathematics) , moral reasoning , philosophy , social psychology , geometry , mathematics , natural language processing , computer science
Justin D'Arms says that moral disapproval is more closely tied to anger than to the “empathic chill” effect I emphasized in Moral Sentimentalism , but I argue that anger is in several ways inappropriate or unsatisfactory as a basis for understanding disapproval. I go on to explain briefly why I think we need not share D'Arms's worries about the possibility of nonveridical empathy but then focus on what he says about the reference‐fixing theory of moral terminology defended in Moral Sentimentalism . I explain why I think his interpretations of my view—both at the Spindel Conference and subsequently—misunderstand the (Kripkean) character of that view. My reply to Lori Watson questions whether her criticisms of Moral Sentimentalism 's account of morality are sufficiently sensitive to the self−other asymmetry that typifies so much of ordinary moral thinking.