Premium
Aretaic Appraisal and Practical Reasons
Author(s) -
Mason Michelle
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the southern journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.281
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 2041-6962
pISSN - 0038-4283
DOI - 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2006.tb00021.x
Subject(s) - virtue , epistemology , psychology , engineering ethics , social psychology , philosophy , engineering
When we criticize someone for being unjust, deceitful, or imprudent—or commend him as just, truthful, or wise—what is the content of our evaluation? On one way of thinking, evaluating agents in terms that employ aretaic concepts evaluates how they regulate their actions (and judgment‐sensitive attitudes) in light of the reasons that bear on them. On this virtue‐centered view of practical reasons appraisal, evaluations of agents in terms of ethical virtues (and vices) are, inter alia , evaluations of them as practical reasoners. Here I consider and respond to an objection that threatens to debunk the virtue‐centered view.