z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Predicting local colonization and extinction dynamics from coarser‐scale surveys
Author(s) -
MoodyWeis Jennifer,
Antonovics Janis,
Alexander Helen M.,
Pilson Diana
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.2008.0906-7590.05282.x
Subject(s) - metapopulation , occupancy , extinction (optical mineralogy) , scale (ratio) , colonization , ecology , local extinction , scaling , environmental science , spatial ecology , statistics , biology , biological dispersal , geography , cartography , mathematics , population , demography , geometry , sociology , paleontology
The demand for methods to translate information between spatial scales (i.e. size of observational units and the total area of study) has intensified given increased recognition that empirical data collection and practical applications occur at scales ranging from individual organisms to landscapes. For example, there has been considerable interest in “scaling‐down” methods that have been successful at predicting fine‐scale species’ distributions from coarse‐scale distributional maps. Here, we describe the application of scaling‐down methods to the estimation of colonization and extinction rates in metapopulations using long‐term, large‐scale data sets of two roadside plant species, Helianthus annuus and Silene latifolia . Fine‐scale data collected from roadside populations were aggregated to generate data at several increasingly coarse scales. The relationships between occupancy, colonization, or extinction and the scale of measurement (scale‐curves) were determined using the standard “fully‐nested” method and the “stratified random sampling” method. Both methods were successful at predicting not only occupancy, but also the dynamic metapopulation processes of extinction and colonization (R 2 values, averaged across species and methods, were 88.5, 69.3, and 88.8%, respectively, for occupancy, extinction, and colonization). Scaling‐down generated more accurate predictions in Helianthus (average R 2 =88.4) compared to Silene (average R 2 =63.4), and in both species, scaling‐down generated more accurate predictions for occupancy and colonizations compared to extinctions. This is one of the first demonstrations that dynamic processes are scalable, and provides a useful methodology for dealing with the logistical challenges of collecting fine‐scale data over large geographic areas when studying metapopulation processes or range limits.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here