Winter commingling of populations of migratory species can cause breeding range underpopulation

We build a model with large‐scale demographic consequences for migratory species. The model operates where four elements co‐occur, and we rely on empirical research using migratory birds to demonstrate them. First, breeding ranges have internal structure flowing from natal philopatry. Second, fecundity varies geographically. Third, populations of different breeding provenances commingle during winter. And fourth, a population‐limiting carrying capacity operates during winter. In the absence of breeding season population‐limitation, only the breeding population with maximum fecundity persists. Consequently, some potential breeding areas that offer suitable and productive habitat are bereft of breeding birds because of the interplay between the geographical fecundity gradient and the shared winter quarters. Where breeding season population‐limitation also plays a role for at least one population, one (or more) breeding population becomes permanently depressed, resulting in a density well below the carrying capacity of the productive breeding habitat that is occupied. In either case, not all populations fare equally well, despite net positive breeding season productivity. Changes in winter carrying capacity, for example habitat degradation in winter quarters, can lead to uneven effects on geographically defined breeding populations, even though there has been no change in the circumstances of the breeding range.