z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using neutral landscapes to identify patterns of aggregation across resource points
Author(s) -
Lancaster Jill
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
ecography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.973
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1600-0587
pISSN - 0906-7590
DOI - 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04381.x
Subject(s) - resource (disambiguation) , context (archaeology) , ecology , range (aeronautics) , spatial ecology , function (biology) , spatial analysis , population , distribution (mathematics) , computer science , geography , statistics , mathematics , biology , computer network , mathematical analysis , materials science , demography , archaeology , evolutionary biology , sociology , composite material
Many organisms are aggregated within resource patches and aggregated spatially across landscapes with multiple resources. Such patchy distributions underpin models of population regulation and species coexistence, so ecologists require methods to analyse spatially‐explicit data of resource distribution and use. I describe a method for analysing maps of resources and testing hypotheses about how resource distribution influences the distribution of organisms, where resource patches can be described as points in a landscape and the number of organisms on each resource point is known. Using a mark correlation function and the linearised form of Ripley's K‐function, this version of marked point pattern analysis can characterise and test hypotheses about the spatial distribution of organisms (marks) on resource patches (points). The method extends a version of point pattern analysis that has wide ecological applicability, it can describe patterns over a range of scales, and can detect mixed patterns. Statistically, Monte Carlo permutations are used to estimate the difference between the observed and expected values of the mark correlation function. Hypothesis testing employs a flexible neutral landscape approach in which spatial characteristics of point patterns are preserved to some extent, and marks are randomised across points. I describe the steps required to identify the appropriate neutral landscape and apply the analysis. Simulated data sets illustrate how the choice of neutral landscape can influence ecological interpretations, and how this spatially‐explicit method and traditional dispersion indices can yield different interpretations. Interpretations may be general or context‐sensitive, depending on information available about the underlying point pattern and the neutral landscape. An empirical example of caterpillars exploiting food plants illustrates how this technique might be used to test hypotheses about adult oviposition and larval dispersal. This approach can increase the value of survey data, by making it possible to quantify the distribution of resource points in the landscape and the pattern of resource use by species.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here