Premium
The Differential Effects of Miras and Mirrors On Eighth‐Grade Females' and Males' Ability to Learn Principles of Plane Mirrors
Author(s) -
Conroy Lynn M.,
Tracy Dyanne M.,
Eckart Joyce A.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
school science and mathematics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.135
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 1949-8594
pISSN - 0036-6803
DOI - 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1994.tb15705.x
Subject(s) - test (biology) , mathematics education , psychology , class (philosophy) , differential effects , developmental psychology , computer science , medicine , biology , artificial intelligence , ecology
In the United States girls and boys are supposedly afforded the same science education opportunities, yet girls continue to score below boys on standardized science tests. In this study of 101 eighth‐grade physical science students, participants took an eight‐day class in which they learned the five principles of plane mirrors. Students were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups using manipulatives: Miras only, Mirrors only, or Miras and Mirrors. Data were analyzed using one‐way and two‐way ANOVAs. Results indicated that males scored significantly higher than females on the chapter test ( p < .05). A significant two‐way interaction on a test of retention indicated that females using mirrors only scored lower than males using the combination of Miras and mirrors. Females' and males' ability to learn principles of plane mirrors may be differentially effected by the manipulatives used. Both females and males benefit when Miras and mirrors are used throughout the learning process.