Premium
Igneous History of the Aubrite Parent Asteroid: Evidence from the Norton County Enstatite Achondrite
Author(s) -
Okada Akihiko,
Keil Klaus,
Taylor G. Jeffrey,
Newsom Horton
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
meteoritics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1945-5100
pISSN - 0026-1114
DOI - 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1988.tb00897.x
Subject(s) - achondrite , geology , geochemistry , breccia , igneous rock , clastic rock , enstatite , parent body , silicic , plagioclase , meteorite , petrology , basalt , chondrite , astrobiology , sedimentary rock , quartz , paleontology , physics
— We studied numerous specimens of the Norton County enstatite achondrite (aubrite) by optical microscopy, electron microprobe, and neutron‐activation analysis. Our main conclusions are the following: 1 . Norton County is a fragmental impact breccia, consisting of a clastic matrix made mostly of crushed enstatite, into which are embedded a variety of mineral and lithic clasts of both igneous and impact melt origin. 2 . The Norton County precursor materials were igneous rocks, mostly plutonic orthopyroxenites, not grains formed by condensation from the solar nebula. 3 . The Mg‐silicate‐rich aubrite parent body experienced extensive melting and igneous differentiation, causing formation of diverse lithologies, some of which have not been described previously. These lithologies include dunites (represented by forsterite crystals), plutonic orthopyroxenites (represented by most enstatite crystals in the matrix), plutonic pyroxenites (the pyroxenitic clasts), and plagioclase‐silica rocks (like the feldspathic clasts). Presence of impact melt breccias (the microporphyritic clasts and the diopside‐plagioclase‐silica clast) of still different compositions further attest to the lithologic diversity of the aubrite parent body.